The Coaster Critic's Blog

The Coaster Critic's Blog
Most Comments
    • Kings Dominion & Carowinds 2010 Roller Coasters
    • Intimidator Coming to Carowinds in 2010
    • Thirteen Announced as Alton Towers' 2010 Psychoaster
    • Top Thrill Dragster vs. Kingda Ka | Roller Coaster Showdown
    • Intimidator 305 Coming to Kings Dominion in 2010
    • Afterburn @ Carowinds | Roller Coaster Reviews
About
The Coaster Critic's Blog is your source for opinionated roller coaster reviews, theme park reviews and a coaster enthusiast's take on all the latest theme park news. Read more...
Social Sites
Facebook  Flickr  Last.fm  MySpace  Technorati  Twitter  YouTube  
Subscribe
Want it delivered? Subscribe to the RSS feed and my latest posts immediately.

Subscribe Via Email
Subscribe Via RSS
Become a Fan!
The Coaster Critic on Facebook
Featured In the News…
Featured on FOX Charlotte

Quoted by the New York Times



Bert the Conqueror
Bert the Conqueror on the Travel Channel

6 Comments

  1. #1 Anonymous says:
    April 13th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    They shoulden’t have been banned.
    It was a malfunction and that does not diserve them to be banned. The kid stuck even had his legs purple.

    Reply
  2. #2 The Coaster Critic says:
    April 15th, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    I’d believe it was a malfunction if it didn’t happen to the same kids twice. Busch wouldn’t just kick some kids out of the park unless they were up to something. It’s not really a good business model to boot people from your park. Especially after the bad experience of being stuck on a ride. I think they wanted their 15 seconds of fame.

    Reply
  3. #3 Anonymous says:
    May 13th, 2008 at 5:11 am

    If the SAME kid is getting stuck and his legs are turning purple, they WHY would he want to keep riding it??

    If I got stuck, I would NOT WANT TO RIDE IT AGAIN.

    Also, WHY would this SAME KID get stuck unless he WAS doing something to cause it???

    Just to suspicious… It’s someone looking to get rich by filing a phony lawsuit against the park.

    Reply
  4. #4 Tom says:
    December 12th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    I would give them one more chance. If it happened to them again, I would blame them, but maybe it was just the slim chance it was a coincedence.

    Reply
  5. #5 JaMeS says:
    December 12th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    i would blame the builders (B&M) fo the incident if the company didn’t have such a good history

    Reply
  6. #6 Quil says:
    December 12th, 2009 at 7:20 pm

    I`d have to agree whith you on that one JaMeS, if they had a bad history.

    Reply

Leave a Comment