Comments on: Steel Coasters vs Wooden Coasters | Weekly Topic

By: Zach

Zach — Sat, 13 Apr 2013 21:51:15 +0000

while steel is more intense and obviously more popular i feel that woodies have a lot more character and are more fun to ride if your not worrying about massive drops and as a side note i think woodies have a lot of potential companies are just too scared too get sued. like son of beast was the only woodie hypercoaster even though it was more than a decade ago

By: Jesse Scott

Jesse Scott — Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:07:03 +0000

Oh wait…they do suck…I agree

By: Jesse Scott

Jesse Scott — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:17:39 +0000

…That's hurtful…jk
But is it really necessary to act like 5 different people to simply say that you don't like roller coaster's?

By: Dillon

Dillon — Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:03:37 +0000

In my book there is no official winner. One is not always better than the other. Steel is innovative, fast, intense but wood can still deliver the same fun and thrills. I don't care what you might think. The purpose of a coaster is to please the crowd, provide memories, and make say "Wow" when you get off. Wood has just the potential to do this as steel. It all depends on how the coaster is designed and built. I feel like wood is misused by manufacturers sometimes. If built the right way, wood can be just as good as steel.
El Toro
The Voyage
Thunderhead
Boulderdash
the list goes on…
So please don't hate on wood just because it doesn't go 400ft in the air at 120mph.

Sorry, I had to get that off my chest.

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:41:25 +0000

TOM WAS HERE

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:40:58 +0000

I know only stupid people enjoy roller coasters!

By: Jack

Jack — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:40:05 +0000

I AGREE WITH PHIL SO MUCH

By: Bob

Bob — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:39:34 +0000

Dont you mean ROLLER COASTERS SUCK…they do I agree

By: Bill

Bill — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:38:21 +0000

I agree with Phil

By: Phil

Phil — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:37:46 +0000

ROLLER COASTER SUCK