<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Giant’s Physics Defying Element</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html</link>
	<description>Roller Coaster Reviews, Theme Park News, &#38; Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:50:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8532</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 23:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uhhh...   DANG!!!  Nearly speechless.  That turn looks TASTY! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhh&#8230;   DANG!!!  Nearly speechless.  That turn looks TASTY! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quil</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8521</link>
		<dc:creator>Quil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 04:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Overbank is one of my favorite elements, and one I&#039;m sad to say isn&#039;t built into too many woodies. I&#039;m happy TG is receiving this one, and I hope that it will work well enough to be incorpartated into more wooden rides around the globe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Overbank is one of my favorite elements, and one I&#8217;m sad to say isn&#8217;t built into too many woodies. I&#8217;m happy TG is receiving this one, and I hope that it will work well enough to be incorpartated into more wooden rides around the globe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merle</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8520</link>
		<dc:creator>Merle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just watched a pov of the roiginal it looks from the pictures like it was completly redone ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just watched a pov of the roiginal it looks from the pictures like it was completly redone </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8519</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i wouldn&#039;t compare this to Gemini. first of all, Gemini blows. it supposedly goes 60 mph, but you feel no speed at all, and there is not a trace of airtime on the whole ride. second, the wood decor that surrounds the twin snoozer isn&#039;t even connected to the track. (or doesn&#039;t seem to be). its a tubular steel track with steel supports, enclosed with some B.S. woodwork to fool people in the queue. Whereas this Texas Giant re-profiling looks to be flat steel track and wood everything else. The coaster should still sway and give like a woodie, just with less bounce and rattle due to the new track. So i hope anyway, the world needs no more bastardized junk heaps like Gemini. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldn&#039;t compare this to Gemini. first of all, Gemini blows. it supposedly goes 60 mph, but you feel no speed at all, and there is not a trace of airtime on the whole ride. second, the wood decor that surrounds the twin snoozer isn&#039;t even connected to the track. (or doesn&#039;t seem to be). its a tubular steel track with steel supports, enclosed with some B.S. woodwork to fool people in the queue. Whereas this Texas Giant re-profiling looks to be flat steel track and wood everything else. The coaster should still sway and give like a woodie, just with less bounce and rattle due to the new track. So i hope anyway, the world needs no more bastardized junk heaps like Gemini. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merle</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8513</link>
		<dc:creator>Merle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[awsome that turn looks rediculous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awsome that turn looks rediculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frog</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8511</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That turn is insane!!!!  And a crazy drop!  This might be my new favorite woodie... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That turn is insane!!!!  And a crazy drop!  This might be my new favorite woodie&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDC</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8510</link>
		<dc:creator>MDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see it as being a steel coaster, because it is classified based on the type of track. It&#039;s a lot like Gemini @ Cedar Point. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see it as being a steel coaster, because it is classified based on the type of track. It&#039;s a lot like Gemini @ Cedar Point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDC</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8509</link>
		<dc:creator>MDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not being moved, but it IS being reprofiled, with its wooden track being replaced by new, steel track. It is also recieving new trains. I would guess that a similar element to that turn was there before, and it&#039;s profile is being changed. As for your first question (How is this possible?), the answer is Math and Science. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not being moved, but it IS being reprofiled, with its wooden track being replaced by new, steel track. It is also recieving new trains. I would guess that a similar element to that turn was there before, and it&#039;s profile is being changed. As for your first question (How is this possible?), the answer is Math and Science. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piedude81</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8508</link>
		<dc:creator>Piedude81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um.... How is this possible? Isn&#039;t Texas Giant being moved? And if so, was this there before? IDK????? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;. How is this possible? Isn&#039;t Texas Giant being moved? And if so, was this there before? IDK????? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof.BAM</title>
		<link>http://www.thecoastercritic.com/2010/12/texas-giants-insane-physics-defying-element.html/comment-page-1#comment-8507</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof.BAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecoastercritic.com/?p=4964#comment-8507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giant should have a new classification (not steel or wood). But that turn looks sick! If that could be done with Son of Beast... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giant should have a new classification (not steel or wood). But that turn looks sick! If that could be done with Son of Beast&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
