Comments on: Help Me With My New Rating System

By: Player 118462.

Player 118462. — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:53:23 +0000

What's the name of the site?

By: The Coaster Critic

The Coaster Critic — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:59:45 +0000

I like that Jack. Nice thought for pay per ride attractions.

By: Dillon

Dillon — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:30:23 +0000

themeparkrides.org

By: Guilherme

Guilherme — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:40:42 +0000

What's your blog?

By: Dillon

Dillon — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:33:08 +0000

on my blog i do a scale out of 50 to expand the range so comparing rides is easier

By: The Coaster Critic

The Coaster Critic — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:00:53 +0000

That's right Judy. These additional factors help show those differences.

By: MDC

MDC — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:29:57 +0000

No. I think Phoenix would get a 6 or a 7 (out of 5).

By: Jack

Jack — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:11:03 +0000

You could do a cost worthiness rating too. For pay per ride coasters, you would give it a 1-5 depending on if it was worth the money. For example, Peonix at knobels would get a 5.

By: Cade

Cade — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:37:59 +0000

cc, yes a 100 point would be perfect. maverick is the closest so far with a 95. and the intensity would be a good thing like the voyage is intense.

By: Quil

Quil — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 07:58:52 +0000

I like the Idea of applying unique categories to certain types of coasters, especialy ones that are rare, such as Fourth Dimension and Bobsled coasters. While the overall fun level could speak for this to a certain extent, I think that individual ratings that showcase something imnportant to the ride would be a good addition to this system.